djarvik wrote:@VMoe86 - impressive! I can't beat the damn Pro 3 with Slow-SIM

it's always 6-3. Every game is tight, but somehow he always gets it.
I can beat one of the Top 4 on Pro 3 with Djokovic or Federer and some other players (Tsonga, del Potro, Fish (!)), but with others some devastating losses or heart-breaking losses. The wins are always close, so the game doesn't ask me to increase difficult -- not yet.
All these impressions below against Federer on Pro 3, Elite/slow, no previews and at US Open. Also before ITST 1.1, but this only effects two of the players listed below.
Gulbis: The power of the forehand is great, as mentioned earlier. Definitely feels right that his groundstrokes are a bit more precise now, but I could hold my own with him pretty well -- until you have that service game in which you cannot hit the corners, no first serve and get broken. Feels spot on if you ask me. He can be overwhelming, but too inconsistent.
Nalbandian: One of my favourite tennis players -- unfortunately lacking a bit in the fitness department. He is a bit slower and less fit compared to the top 4, also has a bit less power and his serve isn't a weapon, but despite this he is still very good. The groundstrokes, especially the backhand and the counter stat, make him good and fun to play with. Moving well, timing the shots well and you are rewarded if you take care of the serve. Usually I have problems on my serve, most service games are a struggle.
Ferrer: Fast, consistent from the baseline and fit -- but so tough to hit winners with him. One really has to be patient, grind out the points and keep on hitting deep, which is possible due to these consistency stats. Not interested in playing as him, but seems ok to me.
Youzhny:Youzhny doesn't have "the weapon", but he does everything well -- good from the baseline and good at serve, solid at the net. Fast enough to defend pretty well. Maybe a bit more power?
Nadal: I don't know, maybe it is me not be using playing as a left-hander or Nadal is really useless at he US Open against Federer -- couldn't play aggressive as him, Federer was returning everything deep, taking my time away. Sounds like what I expect from a real life match between these two at the US Open, so it seems ok, but one could reconsider his top spin stat -- he can flatten his shots out to a certain degree and be successful with it.
Dolgopolov: Agree that he deserves a bit more power, was difficult to hit through Federer that way. Consistency on groundstrokes and serve felt right, stamina also fits him.
Baghdatis: A bit weaker version of Nalbandian, so it is ok.
Ljubicic: Soon to be retired and god damn is he slow! Couldn't get his serve right, so I couldn't do much with him. Maybe replace him with another player (because of the retirement and because I couldn't do anything playing as him

)
Tsonga: I didn't get too many free points with the serve (but on Pro 3 the AI already returns great), but the power of the forehand is great. Backhand is also ok. He seems pretty slow and I wouldn't attribute him worse stamina than Dolgopolov, for instance. Otherwise ok.
Isner: H U G E serve, followed by powerful and solid forehand -- got me to a tie break against Federer. Feels right, no need to change anything so far, but his serve could be too good against human opponents.
del Potro: Sick forehand, just sick. Good that it isn't that consistent. Backhand is very good. With his speed stat it is more difficult getting to short slices, which is good. His serve feels right: Powerful, but difficult enough so that you cannot time it perfectly that frequently.
Fish: Still don't know how I managed to win as Fish against Federer, but my forehand was clicking -- quite a few winners off that wing. In other sets it didn't work that well, so the consistency is about right for Fish on that wing. Investing enough time to master the serve, quite a good player. He can also play at the net and his speed is ok.
Cilic: Just like the real life version -- has many good shots, but too inconsistent in the end. The serve is crucial here, although his game doesn't solely depend on it. I really struggled on serve, was difficult.
Roddick: Similar to Isner, but Isner is a bit more inconsistent. On the other hand Isner hits flatter and has overall a bit more power. Roddick can rally and volley better -- ok for the current Roddick.
Llodra: I didn't win a single game against Federer.

Difficult, but was also my first experience as S&V in TE 2011. Don't see anyone playing as him -- Federer almost has as good volley stats...
Melzer: Inconsistent power baseliner -- ok.
Kohlschreiber: Doing everything well from the baseline, but not great at anything -- spot on! As long as the player controlling him doesn't spray errors it is up to the opponent to beat him with good play.
Harrison: Weaker version of Roddick, but just played a couple of games as him.