Rebus... visual goody of the day

by **djarvik** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:12

Good point Iain.

Look at the first Q's post in this thread.

I was just trying to say that Q should stay out of the thread that has Such Content. That's all. No need to point out that it is not appropriate.

....respect the wish of other to enjoy this stuff.

Q, you know we love you, don't get upset or anything.....

by **jayl0ve** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:20

I don't think we should be making fun of Q at all either, BUT I also think Q. needs to stop (not-so) subtly preaching everytime there's a frickin titty or an ass cheek.

Q, if you don't like it, don't look...well, look, but don't look again. I mean, do we really have to put warnings on threads...for a 25 year old man? Don't let your little sister or whoever look on here Q, because I'm for sure not keeping little ones like her in mind when I post, and I shouldn't have to.

Maybe Q isn't exactly trying to convert anybody to be a Jehova's Witness, but he does make it clear that he thinks nude or nearly-nude pictures of women are 'WRONG' and that the naked (female) human body is 'SINFUL'. It gets old. Real old.

by **NARCOSIS2009** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:23

djarvik wrote:Good point Iain.

Look at the first Q's post in this thread.

I was just trying to say that Q should stay out of the thread that has Such Content. That's all. No need to point out that it is not appropriate.

....respect the wish of other to enjoy this stuff.

Q, you know we love you, don't get upset or anything.....

Anyways.... Im glad u started posted again, albeit rudely :wink:

P.S, Since your declaring your love for Q, I thought id declare mine for you and samael.... :lol:

by **djarvik** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:25

Lets keep this thread straight, shell we? :wink:

by **NARCOSIS2009** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:27

True, I mean its probably the first thread Samael and Jayl0ve have posted something that isnt bent. :lol:

by **jayl0ve** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:30

All of our (Samael and I) posts have some kind of gay innuendo in it, you're just not looking hard enough :wink:

by **djarvik** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:42

Less of this:

More of this:

by **jayl0ve** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:52

, also this:

by **jayl0ve** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:54

by **jayl0ve** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:56

'Woah, that was rough...'

by **jayl0ve** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:56

Ok, quick...something pleasant, something pleasant

by **jayl0ve** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:58

Actually, how about something just absurd:

by **djarvik** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:03

[/quote]

by **pink moozipan** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:04

by **Rob ITST** » Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:07

djarvik wrote:Why does everyone jumps to Q defense when it is obvious we are all JOKING?

I don't see "everyone" jumping to Q's defense. I see a few people defending him when he's getting bullied by others.

Some of the comments and photos were making fun of his religious beliefs - very low class imo. If you disagree with his beliefs, that's fine, but there are better ways to do so.

Do I think Q is a bit too sensitive about some things? Absolutely. But there are also times when he's objecting to things that are against the rules of the forum.

And lastly, @ Q: You are not a moderator. If you think someone has posted something that's innapropriate, it's probably best to point it out to Slicer, Cro, or myself, instead of telling people what they should and shouldn't post. It's our job to decide if something violates the rules.

Rebus... visual goody of the day

Who is online