Roddick vs Monfils

by **Samael** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:13

In the meantime, Roddick has won the second set and is 2-0 up in the third. What do you think, will he win it today(it's almost dark in Paris)?

by **Chederer** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:13

Samael wrote:Yet it as. You must make amends. Let me think for a proper punishment for you.

neways...i was just making a point...monfils can probably not see roddick very well either....it was STUPID to start the match so late...completely idiotic whoever made that call

by **Q. Reese** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:15

That was the first thing I said when I did see Cirtsea (something like that) playing Jankovic.

That match was carrying well over 2.5 hours!! ESPN360.com was advertising that Roddick and Monfils were next. I was like, "HOW?" :shock:

by **Amazing Matheja** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:27

It's hard for Andy...He doesn't deseve this...They don't play in normal conditions...Do they?...

by **Amazing Matheja** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:36

I can't wait for the after match conference...

by **Chederer** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:37

yeah....im sure we will here what a dumb decision this was to start the match in the dark....pathetic

by **DarkPaladin87** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:50

Damn just saw the match, such poor conditions for both players. They should have started the match tomorrow at 9.30 ECT. Huge dissapointment of the french organization. Sure they've made a schedule and tried to stick to that, but starting a match this late at day, pathetic.
Roddick missed like 5 easy smashes during the match which he never ever misses. Monfils served good though! :lol:

Can't wait to see the press conference. A very pissed roddick speaking against a brigade of journalists with stupid questions. Should be amusing to watch. Perhaps someone has a link?

by **kyuuji** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:58

see Monfils in 3 set, I knew that Roddick will not play his best :S
He most almost all his balls! And EASY balls!
6/4 6/2 6/3 not a good score, but Roddick hate Clay and I hate it too.

by **Coolhand Texas** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:00

The thing that suprised me most about the match was monfils outserving roddick.

If minfils was down, then they would have suspended play, but since he had momentum they let him play on. It was clearly too dark to play, but their frenchamn was winning and they didnt want to hurt his chaces :wink:

by **Samael** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:04

Lol, guys!!! AT 21 45 French time it gets dark in Paris! The match ended at 21 40 or so. Forget this stupid argument of yours. Mon fils outplayed Rod dick's.

by **kyuuji** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:25

I live in france, and at 20:40 it wasn't to dark, but the end of the match was dark..
I don't think it's this :lol:

by **Chederer** » Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:35

Samael wrote:Lol, guys!!! AT 21 45 French time it gets dark in Paris! The match ended at 21 40 or so. Forget this stupid argument of yours. Mon fils outplayed Rod dick's.

well....i dont know about you samael, but when im playing on a court with lights i like to turn them on once the sun starts going down...because i cant see the ball very well on just a 85mph serve.....thats why in this year of 2009 every court on the ATP tour needs lights--it gets dark here at about 8pm but at 7pm the sun starts going down and would prefer there be lights at about the time the sun starts setting IMO

Roddick vs Monfils

roddick or monfils

Who is online