ATP World Tour Challenge 2010 - make your picks!

by **Elargento** » Tue, 04 May 2010 01:17

GOA MASTER MDMA wrote:why unfair? sorry but i think different here .
its kind of correct when it also counts in groups like in our itst group!
we have now no winner in our group - is that good ? i think no !!

sure thats only my opinion- but i´m sure alot from our group,or other groups with same problem ,will think in same way

it's a tie, deal with it. let's say there are 5000 people who have the same score, why a random number in the final should separate one from the other 5000 places, it is better to give them the same standing.

by **jayl0ve** » Tue, 04 May 2010 01:20

It's not a big deal to me. I'm just unfamiliar with the rules since this is the first time I've done the 'ATP Fantasy' thing. I don't really care if I win or not, I just thought it might be a glitch or something...

Anyways I had a lot of fun, can't wait for the next tourney.

by **GOA MASTER MDMA** » Tue, 04 May 2010 01:39

i know JON-its not that important for you - i only thought something is wrong .i´m sure that slicer gave us the rightexplaining( result )whats the deal here - its only good to know whats the deal

Elargento wrote:
GOA MASTER MDMA wrote:why unfair? sorry but i think different here .
its kind of correct when it also counts in groups like in our itst group!
we have now no winner in our group - is that good ? i think no !!

sure thats only my opinion- but i´m sure alot from our group,or other groups with same problem ,will think in same way

it's a tie, deal with it. let's say there are 5000 people who have the same score, why a random number in the final should separate one from the other 5000 places, it is better to give them the same standing.

elargento i can see and accept your opinion in that case.

i only think forward totally different about -
i see no problem to bring this also in the groups .
thats much more interrest in my opinion.
how many times you will be the number 1 in the overall draw ??
NEVER?? ONE TIMES??.
so with that ;this last tiebreak prediction is totally senseless in my eyes coz you never will need it.

by **Elargento** » Tue, 04 May 2010 02:20

it's not senseless it has been implemented for prices purposes onyl. although i agree with you that within our itst, in case of a tie the thre should be a tiebreak. but globably i am fine that the tiebreak is only for the prices purpose only.

by **GOA MASTER MDMA** » Tue, 04 May 2010 04:53

like i said earlier -i understand and see your point.

to be honest -i play this game not for the prices at all !! (thats 100% true)

i vote and play this game just for fun and to be number 1 in our group .
so its little sad that we can´t implant this tiebreaker in our group

by **Elargento** » Tue, 04 May 2010 05:15

GOA MASTER MDMA wrote:like i said earlier -i understand and see your point.

to be honest -i play this game not for the prices at all !! (thats 100% true)

i vote and play this game just for fun and to be number 1 in our group .
so its little sad that we can´t implant this tiebreaker in our group

well, in adition to that there should be statistics saying which player from the group won each event, because in two tns nobody will remeber who won rome. there are a lot to be improved in this fantasy game, let's hope they realise it soon.

by **djarvik** » Sat, 08 May 2010 15:01

Make your picks before Sunday (May 9) at 11:00am ET for the

Mutua Madrilena Masters Madrid

by **TomBs** » Sat, 08 May 2010 15:45

I am so gonna regret picking Verdasco over Nadal.

by **Vieira151** » Sat, 08 May 2010 17:31

I have Nadal beating Fed in teh final. A Fed/Ferrer semi and Nadal/Soderling semi.
I have Fed baeting Gulbis in the QF incase you wondered Al :wink:

by **Mike Rotchtickles** » Sat, 08 May 2010 17:59

Fed's lost the plot a bit these days.
I can easily see him getting beat in an early round.
In the tourney he's currently playing in, he's a set down to Montanes. He could of course still win that match, but his post aussie form has been far from convincing thus far.

by **fedfan** » Sat, 08 May 2010 18:07

Djokovic has withdrawn!

by **Cro Morgan** » Sat, 08 May 2010 18:53

djarvik wrote:Make your picks before Sunday (May 9) at 11:00am ET for the

Mutua Madrilena Masters Madrid

And how far do we have Gulbis advancing in this tourney?

Me, I have Ernie catching an early flight ... losing to (yet another) Fed-Killer in the first round. :twisted:

by **Amazing Matheja** » Sun, 09 May 2010 06:56

Argh!This Madrid draw is tough...
Fed/Wav...Youzhny/Gulbis...Gulbis/Roddick...Verdasco/Karlovic ( :shock:

The Ace Monster is back!Run!You fool!)...Nalby/Berdich...Verdasco/Nalby...Monaco/Soderling...I even have a Murray/Andreev that causes me some good headache!...I'll go with Igor :twisted:

But the toughest one for me is that Roddick/Gulbis...I just have no single clue!

by **AUSSIE_FABS** » Sun, 09 May 2010 07:09

Yeah some tough ones with gulb/rod if it was hardcourt I would definently go with rod but with clay there is a bit of doubt even though roddick still good on clay. Also fed loses to waw murray to querry , soderling tops verdasco and sadly monfils only gets to tsonga. Nadal wins obviouslyunless his knees explode. Oh also he faces ferrer in final, I'd like to see ferrer get to the final against nadal if that possible I don't want a fed nadal final the way fed is playing.

by **Coolhand Texas** » Sun, 09 May 2010 07:23

god my draw looks like djarvik did it.

I have a fed gulbis rematch, in which, gulbis gets him again!!

ATP World Tour Challenge 2010 - make your picks!

Who is online