Yea. You are questioning a well-known medal count that was posted by NBC itself.
Put two-and-two together . . .
When a news writer publishes the article for an on-going event, it is more and likely going to be obsolete quickly. So, when I posted my
Qlympics summary of what I saw, it was already aging. LOL.
Events were still going, but I had to sleep, as it was already 1:00 a.m. my time. LOL.
So, for the most part, you are showing that the United States picked-up more medals. Thanks for updating me on that, as I would have found this out tonight (or now . . . if I turned on the TV).
Thanks pal.

Oh, with the no-names used comments, I chose to write this way. I think it shows less favortism and encourage people to watch it more. You know, "I wonder who the 'flying-tomato' guy is."
Thus, we can talk about the events more and more. It is just a perspective that a writer can chose. Surely, this is my opinion, and it is not gold.
Lastly, it seems like you are going by a medal count that has some point value assigned to the medal or some sort? I only go by the total amount of medals (no point value assigned).