Federer vs Djokovic

[Q. Reese]

federer hits a between the leg shot winner!!!!!

WOW, that is why he is number, and then takes the match.

Absolutely incredible play

"WOW, that is why he is number ONE, and then takes the match."

[Mike Rotchtickles]

Here's the youtube link for that crazy shot.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVQhIEPbM0g

[Q. Reese]

Dear goodness. I was just about to look for it, and here you are! Thanks man! Good looking out!

[jayl0ve]

Can't think of any greater shot by anybody, ever...these are very close though: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xIB2wksxtk and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBqWpQXG ... annel_page

[Q. Reese]

Can't think of any greater shot by anybody, ever...these are very close though: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xIB2wksxtk and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBqWpQXG ... annel_page

Very good points from the baseline legend.

[GOA MASTER MDMA]

Here's the youtube link for that crazy shot.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVQhIEPbM0g

sadly i haven´t seen the match yesterday .
thats the shoot of the year

[jayl0ve]

@ all the stupid haters who thought that Roger was done from late 2008- early '09 Must suck to be you and have to swallow your stupid pride, Federer is on top of the men's game once again, just like he should be. He made Chokeabitch look like a junior.

[Mike Rotchtickles]

yeah exactly, you tell them, jay
those darned non-believers! i can just see their whining faces now

[MisterGregory42]

In my eyes, Fed is the greatest player ever...no question about it. After today it'll be 16 slams and counting.

[GOA MASTER MDMA]

okay i saw now parts from the match. and i must say fed played in a impossant way .he played very powerfull, with very risky shoots in an awesome accuracy.
djorko played not so bad at all. he loose little unlucky the second set.
BY THE WAY THE REFEREE WAS HORRIBLE .
in this form federer is my favorite for the us open title . so on this level he will blows del potro from court.
i predict a 4 set win for fed- 7-5 7-6 5-7 6-4

[jayl0ve]

yeah exactly, you tell them, jay
those darned non-believers! i can just see their whining faces now

Hahahahahahahahahah OH MY GOD, that is one of the greatest gif's I've ever seen...

[Gunz Buz n LustBANNED]

Go home Jaylove and Bloufo

I still love to watch Nadal reducing Federer to tears, and having to be consoled by a kid (in the sense of the GS stage) that he will 'improve Sampras record for sure'. I also loved it when Federer showed his true colours and gave his racket a moerse klap (destroying it) and discredited Djokovic of playing horribly. I'll stick to what I said, Federer is one of the greatest players of all time unfortunately and really did take the most out of his substandard era; all credit to him (no sarcasm).

I'm not going to swallow my 'stupid pride', statistics and history are a permanent thing, but the way someone makes it is what imho, really counts. Federer is on top of the mens game because the only worthy competitor of his has been sidelined with a serious injury (in the risk of sounding too biblical like Q, sometimes I do think there is a power overlooking Federer that only provides him with favourable consequences.) The way I see it, Nadal is going to show whos 'on top of the mens game' next year. I hope you're not pulling a Q and commenting on a match on where you watched some highlights of it. Djokovic played a great match, but Federer played the big points better and won in a pretty tight affair; hardly a junior performance from Brokeback Chokeabitch.

Today its going to be another mundane GS final victory for Federer where his oppenent played out of his skin in the entire tournament but freezes in the final, losing in straight sets and subscribing to www.anothergrandslamhandover4fed.com .

Quite frankly you can be as ignorant as you wish and say ' I dont care what you have to say, you're just jealous and a subjective assh*** whose a Federer hater and a Nadal/Sampras fanboy'. I'm not subjective and I wont downplay his incredible achievements, but for a moment throw your undying loyalty for him out the window and see the type of competition Federer had and how they played against him (not all 15, but the majority) en route to his 15 Grandslams. With that in consideration, if you are interested in Tennis, I advise you to check out this website and see what you think:

http://www.tennisthoughts.com/2009/07/0 ... ugher-job/

I think Federer is a class act and defo worthy of being one of the GOAT if not the GOAT , but even if he wins 25 GS's against (mostly) underachievers/past their prime players like he has done before, I still dont think he has proved himself against competitors that can take it to Federer. It's important to note what kind of 'dominant' and 'untouchable' player is he if he cant even defeat his archnemesis and only worthy competitor when it counts. I think Federer will feel bitter and perhaps somewhat complexed once he retires knowing he didn't have Nadals number in their respective careers (albeit same era. (I think Rafa is 6-2 in grandslam meetings).

Jay, Bloufo and 99% of ITST, don't start going on an abusing rampage; blowing your load prematurely, and saying what an ignorant and dom esel I am . If you are now thinking I dont credit Federer for his achievements and hate him in general, then you have read my post completely wrong

*At Bloufos GIF: To be fair, Katie Holmes was sooooooo lekker in that faggot-esque show

[Amazing Matheja]

Very nicely said...But i think you underestimate a bit other Fed's opponents...I don't how to argue more with this with correct words

[Gunz Buz n LustBANNED]

It is a matter of opinion regarding the competition of Federer. Obviously the top 50 are of a solid level but it's tough to see them as THAT great (in comparison to Sampras's). My m8 who compiled this statistical report regarding Federer and Sampras summed it up pretty well what the two prevalent opinions are:

a) Federer seems so much better than the rest of the field (except Nadal) – is he really that exceptional (and the rest of the field is still very good) or is he simply very good and rest of the field not that good? Compare that to Sampras’ opponents…

b) If Federer would have played the same game against Agassi, Sampras, Rafter, Muster, Kuerten, Safin, Becker, Courier (just to name a few) in their best years, would he still have won 14 Grand Slams in 6 years?

[jayl0ve]

Well anyways I wasn't talking about you in particular, if that's what you thought I mean, sorry if I offended you or something, I'm just having fun....I don't really take it too seriously...yeah I watched the entire match, I watch almost every important match...other than that I'm not gonna really respond, wow sorry