The BLX is different from the KFactor - it has "Basalt" fibers that Wilson claims to improve feel.
The real questions whenever a new racquet technology comes along are: How much difference does it make, and is the difference a good one?
jayl0ve wrote:Did anybody catch that Exo on Tennis Channel recently? It was Bryan Bros. vs. Jensen Bros in doubles, with the Bryan Bros having to use wooden racquets.
Bob was still hitting some bombs on his service game. Altogether it didn't look that much different coming off their racquets
Sampras played against Lendl and had to use a wooden racquet...he actually said he hated itBut I think that's cuz he was using a cracked frame.
VillaJ100 wrote:I learned to play with a wooden racket. It wasn't easy at all but then when I got a modern racket when I was 12 I was amazed. I think a wooden racket really helps you build excellent technique and fundamentals due to how unforgiving they are.
djarvik wrote:VillaJ100 wrote:I learned to play with a wooden racket. It wasn't easy at all but then when I got a modern racket when I was 12 I was amazed. I think a wooden racket really helps you build excellent technique and fundamentals due to how unforgiving they are.
I would argue this to the death. I am pretty sure it actually hurt you more then helped you.There is just no compassing between the modern game and the wooden are, there is a reason for evolution and technique changed a lot. Its not even technology, it is more of a stroke production and top spin.
One also can argue that the smaller sweet spot actually bad for a beginner.
As much as I respect "the wood" .... I am soooo glad we past that!
RainingAmoeba79 wrote:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest