Gulbis VS Murray

by **Coolhand Texas** » Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:10

Dragos wrote:I haven't figured that out. I only looked up to the R16, where he'd face most likely Wawrinka...

He could face gonzalez in QF, but i dont think Gonzo would have a chance

by **fedfan** » Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:18

djarvik wrote:
fedfan wrote:I'll admit I haven't seen much of Gulbis lately, mainly because he has hard ly winning any matches but I will happily stand corrected if he brings these sorts of options to todays match.

Please, as a favor to me Watch today's match. All I am asking. The guy deserves support, you WILL be entertained. I would love to hear your opinion win or lose.

@Iain
Yep. Lets discuss that after the match. You will have easier time to convince me

Sorry Djarvik but Gulbis seems to be heading the wrong way on the evidence of this performance. He was hitting the ball but appeared really disengaged. The serve was good, the groundies ok but his movement was lacklustre and his volley poor.

I know he can play better than this but I still see him as nothing more than a great ball striker who can play great one week and terrible the next. I hope he puts the work in and proves me wrong over the next couple of years though.

by **SoundfSilence** » Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:44

I was expecting Gulbis to push Murray, from the hype we have seen in some media (and here).

Nevertheless, it was a solid performance from Murray.

by **Q. Reese** » Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:03

If Murray can subside the pressure of playing at Wimbledon amongst his home crowd, I think he will win it.

If Gulbis plays very well and just intimidate Murray, he will win it.

I do not think Murray will get far at Wimbledon, because it seems like every home country player there does not do well. LOL. :lol:

So, I am going to go with Gulbis on this one, going with the odds as one put it here.

by **Samael** » Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:04

Q, you know, the match has finished 3 hours ago...

by **Q. Reese** » Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:08

I was thinking that, but I was not 100% sure. I cannot get Wimbledon on ESPN 360. I thought we were speculating here . . . LOL.

Sorry mate. Doing research now . . .

2009-06-25 1/32 A. Murray 3-0 E. Gulbis 6-2 7-5 6-3

Haha. Thanks Dragos.

by **Chederer** » Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:28

Dragos wrote:Q, you know, the match has finished 3 hours ago...

\

ha ha ha....hes only 4,289 posts away man

by **NARCOSIS2009** » Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:51

NARCOSIS 1-0 DJARVIK

YOU LOSE!! KO!!

Yes Gulbis does eveything better than murray *COUGH*, the only thing he does better is lose :lol:

And Dragos thought you liked Murray now

But yes your right Murray will lose to some romanian low life.

by **Q. Reese** » Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:39

“In a world filled with hate, we must still dare to hope. In a world filled with anger, we must still dare to comfort. In a world filled with despair, we must still dare to dream. And in a world filled with distrust, we must still dare to believe.” - Micheal Jackson

I read your quote from Michael Jackson, and I was very sad to hear that he died today at the hospital.

by **Coolhand Texas** » Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:58

NARCOSIS2009 wrote:NARCOSIS 1-0 DJARVIK

YOU LOSE!! KO!!

Yes Gulbis does eveything better than murray *COUGH*, the only thing he does better is lose

And Dragos thought you liked Murray now

But yes your right Murray will lose to some romanian low life.

It appears that all of his who picked Gulbis to win, should now punch ourselves repeatedly until we feel dizzy because we mad one of the dumbest picks ever.

Murray did look pretty good, but he is still boring to me

by **Q. Reese** » Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:59

That is why I wanted Gulbis to win. LOL. Girls hit harder than Murray for crying out loud.

by **jayl0ve** » Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:14

I don't really understand what the big deal with Gulbis is. He's not all that great a player...TONS of people can whallop the ball. I've seen him play many times and the only thing that's impressed me is the raw power. Other than that, he makes some really really dumb decisions, often.

by **Q. Reese** » Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:12

He is not as bad as Blake. He just plays like Youzny. Guy has too many great shots but do not know what to do with himself or construct the plays against his opponents.

by **emate007** » Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:16

Not as BAD as Blake? Blake is a much better player than Gulbis. They suffer from the same brain disease and pick stupid shots to hit frequently, but Blake does everything a little better than Gulbis.

by **Coolhand Texas** » Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:18

emate007 wrote:Not as BAD as Blake? Blake is a much better player than Gulbis. They suffer from the same brain disease and pick stupid shots to hit frequently, but Blake does everything a little better than Gulbis.

Yes and the rankings show that

Gulbis VS Murray

Who will win?

Who is online