US Open

by **Samael** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:10

Wawrinka played like a God, especially in sets three and four. Poor Mutant tried to be aggressive, but failed miserably. Well, maybe next year. Hehe. Lol.

by **Moralspain** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:14

Moralspain wrote:
coke4 wrote:
Moralspain wrote:Wawrinka wins.....this is very good for Rafa, if he gets to the SF he won't meet Murray who beat him 2 years ago in the SF, good thing

hehe, you lost the bet hehe

yeah i know, but i'm happy anyway, good chance for Rafa this year

ok, Rog as my avatar and "enjoy picking...." as a signature for 1 month, there you go :lol:

by **AUSSIE_FABS** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:12

Wow draw really opened up for rafa. This could be his best chance. I'd love to see monfils some how make it to final a match between those to is always good. But a rafa djok match would be epic and fed rafa match is always good, there just something about their matches that is awesome.

by **jayl0ve** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:00

I think it has something to do with them being the 2 best players in the world

by **AUSSIE_FABS** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:16

Probably lol. Also YOUZHNY WTF. I leave with him at 1 set up and 5-1 to comeback to see the beginning of tie break which he loses.

by **jayl0ve** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:22

I don't get how Isner can hit even a single fault service, he's 9 goddamn feet tall.

BTW peep the new signature everybody...especially Dragos

by **AUSSIE_FABS** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:02

Isner actually can't volley.

by **Otlichno** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:06

Pathetic loss for Dementieva, she had what, 5 match points and served for the match against Stosur.

I mean losing to Stosur is embarrassing in itself, but losing to her after a lead. :roll:

When will you ever learn Lena, why be nervous against such a crappy player.

by **jayl0ve** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:10

You have serious, serious, SERIOUS bias problems :lol:

by **fedfan** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:48

Nadal looks a cert for the final now, can't see anyone in the top half taking him out.

Surprised that Sharapova/Wozniaki and Fish/Djokovic didn't make the night session.

by **jayl0ve** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:52

No less a tennis authority than LIL' WAYNE has Nadal to win the title: http://www.eurweb.com/?p=46250

:lol:

by **Otlichno** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:58

jayl0ve wrote:You have serious, serious, SERIOUS bias problems

About Ivanovic, definitely, I just hate her.

But Stosur on any court other than clay is a top 30 player at best.

Dementieva lost the match, Stosur did not win it, especially as Dementieva had 5 match points, one on her own serve, and served for the match.

by **Saarbrigga** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:26

fedfan wrote:Nadal looks a cert for the final now, can't see anyone in the top half taking him out.

- Lopez: defeated him in Queens
- Ferrer: defeated him US Open 2007
- Verdasco: almost defeated him AO 2009
- Wawrinka: can beat anyone if he plays like he did against the mutant

Enough?

And even if he reaches the final, if Federer is his opponent he s the underdog.
They both played just 2 times on a very fast court (Shanghai 2006/2007), results:
2006: 6-4 7-5 Federer
2007: 6-4 6-1 Federer

Nadal didn t even won a set there.

Federer should beat him in 3 or 4, like Rafa beat him in 3 or 4 if they play on clay.

If Nadal is at 100 at RG, he s like unstopable...same thing for Federer in NY.

by **fedfan** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:57

Even me as a Federer fan knows that Nadal can beat Federer on any surface because he has a psychological edge, although if it wasnt for that I would always expect Federer to win on a fast court.

In other tournaments the other guys can challenge Nadal but I do not see any of these guys beating him over 5 sets if a chance at a GS final is on the line.

by **jayl0ve** » Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:50

Head to heads and past defeats mean nothing to Nadal, he has a mental edge over every single tennis player on the planet...bet against him if you are retarded, otherwise get with the program.

US Open

Who is online