check this out...
fh90 vol50
bh69 pwr79
srv60 spd90
ret55 stm72
or
fh79 vol50
bh69 pwr90
srv72 spd80
ret50 stm70
Moderator: Senior Hosts
Norberto H wrote:I will risk the **** out of you guys with a setup like this:
Power 90
Speed 90
Forehand 79
Backhand 69
Serve 50
Return 53
Volley 50
Stamina 79
Be prepared to get crushed![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Norberto H wrote:I will risk the **** out of you guys with a setup like this:
Power 90
Speed 90
Forehand 79
Backhand 69
Serve 50
Return 53
Volley 50
Stamina 79
Be prepared to get crushed![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Rob ITST wrote:Norberto H wrote:I will risk the **** out of you guys with a setup like this:
Power 90
Speed 90
Forehand 79
Backhand 69
Serve 50
Return 53
Volley 50
Stamina 79
Be prepared to get crushed![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That one doesn't work. You can't have fh and bh at 90. Lower one to 69 and you're good.
djarvik wrote:8)
I can confirm, the rules work! We have been testing then with Rob, went thru most possible players. Every time we played I changed my mind on which setup will dominate, and that's a great thing, that means they are all very, very balanced.
Rob, I knew we had something there...![]()
This is official SAVIOR of TS3.
Long live TS3, Long live TS3!
....now everyone claps, shakes my hand and thanks me for my bold effort that I have made and abuse that I have taken.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Rob ITST wrote:Norberto H wrote:I will risk the **** out of you guys with a setup like this:
Power 90
Speed 90
Forehand 79
Backhand 69
Serve 50
Return 53
Volley 50
Stamina 79
Be prepared to get crushed![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If you can risk consistently with 69 I'll be impressed.
Norberto H wrote:Rob ITST wrote:Norberto H wrote:I will risk the **** out of you guys with a setup like this:
Power 90
Speed 90
Forehand 79
Backhand 69
Serve 50
Return 53
Volley 50
Stamina 79
Be prepared to get crushed![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If you can risk consistently with 69 I'll be impressed.
I'm not sure how big the difference in an online match would be, but at least against the computer on very hard I can risk consistently even with 30 on everything - would probably ´be hard though, to risk consistantly against a guy, who really mixes it up great - with 30 of course - with 69 I would crush such a guy nevertheless![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
CHEDERER wrote:the only difference i see in a higher return stat is that the double risk return is easier to pull of and a little more consistent....the lower the return stat the more you just have to use LT
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest