Rob ITST wrote:I think what you guys are seeing is what gave us our "eureka" moment. We realized we liked all of the setups, but we didn't love any of them. They all have some weakness you must learn to play with. If we loved them, it would be the the setups we would create if the only goal was winning - which wouldn't be an improvement.
Actually, I love Bishop! He is absolutely perfect for my game. This is a good thing, because I absolutely hate boring stacked setups.
I've now tried four players:
1) Bishop - played against Petrelli's Bucci. Who said Sim is slow?! This match was fast pace from the off! I won it 6-4, 6-4, but it could have gone either way. You had to play smart, take risks at the right time etc. Just what Sim is about.
2) Thompson - played against Petrelli's Lopez. I've never used a tall lanky player before so it took time to get used to this. Not a bad player, again the matchup was balanced, score was 6-4, 3-6, 6-1 to me. Lopez was tough to play against, he doesn't have extreme weaknesses, so I had to finish points off up net or take risks or guess which side to go and go.
3) Sixx - played against Tombs' Striker. Sixx definately lacks the reach due to his height, but he makes up for this with speed. Although good volley stats, it wasn't consistent for me (I think due to reach). Tombs is good at S & V, but either he didn't serve as well as he normally does, or Striker is too slow..
4) Lopez - again vs Tombs' Striker. We figured out that Striker is not the right guy for Tombs (no chance against decent returns). Lopez was nice though. Good power.